These were books written by writers who recognized the sentence as the one true theater of endeavor, as the place where writing comes to a point and attains its ultimacy. As a reader, I finally knew what I wanted to read, and as someone now yearning to become a writer, I knew exactly what I wanted to try to write: narratives of steep verbal topography, narratives in which the sentence is a complete, portable solitude, a minute immediacy of consummated language—the sort of sentence that, even when liberated from its receiving context, impresses itself upon the eye and the ear as a totality, an omnitude, unto itself. I once later tried to define this kind of sentence as “an outcry combining the acoustical elegance of the aphorism with the force and utility of the load-bearing, tractional sentence of more or less conventional narrative.” The writers of such sentences became the writers I read and reread. I favored books that you could open to any page and find in every paragraph sentences that had been worked and reworked until their forms and contours and their organizations of sound had about them an air of having been foreordained—as if this combination of words could not be improved upon and had finished readying itself for infinity.
  1. cursingincursive reblogged this from infinitegestures
  2. roadburdened reblogged this from kelsfjord
  3. melonpult reblogged this from kelsfjord
  4. fillthepage reblogged this from kelsfjord
  5. breathenitrogen reblogged this from kelsfjord
  6. clickandboom reblogged this from kelsfjord
  7. thevikingqueen reblogged this from kelsfjord
  8. ghostnineone reblogged this from kelsfjord
  9. italicsmine said: I love teaching this essay! Though, I never ever believe Lutz’s description of his early relationship to language…
  10. This was featured in #Lit
  11. infinitegestures reblogged this from kelsfjord
  12. kelsfjord posted this
Blog comments powered by Disqus